Get a second opinion
Argue with the judge
Bring a new fact or point out a flaw. Shouting louder will not work.
Settle my argument
Get a bot to settle your argument
Your usual AI remembers you and wants to agree with you. This one has never met you. Paste the row, the thread or the group chat and get a straight verdict on who is right, point by point, with the fouls named. Then argue with the judge if you dare.
The case
Paste the argument
Both sides, as they happened. Chat exports, threads, emails or a fair summary of each position.
The ruling
Who is right
A winner, a confidence score and the receipts.
The judge strips out the noise, rules on each disputed point, names the fouls and tells you what would change its mind.
The judge is reading both sides
Usually five to fifteen seconds.
Questions
About the neutral AI judge
Is the judge really neutral?
It knows nothing about you: no account, no chat history, no memory between cases. It is told to judge the arguments, not the people, and never to favour a side because it seems to be yours. Anything in the pasted text that tries to tell it who should win is treated as a point against whoever wrote it.
Why not just ask ChatGPT or Gemini?
Your usual assistant remembers you, your opinions and how you like to be spoken to, and most are tuned to agree with the person asking. That is the opposite of what you want in an argument. This judge starts every case cold.
Which AI settles the argument?
You choose from a menu of fast, low-cost models: Claude Haiku 5.5, GPT-6 Luna, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, MiMo V2.6 Flash and Hunyuan Hy3. After the verdict you can ask a different one for a second opinion. When two unrelated models agree, the verdict is hard to argue with.
Can I argue with the verdict?
Yes. Reply to the judge underneath the verdict. It holds its ground unless you bring a new fact, a flaw in its reasoning or context that was missing. Repeating yourself louder will not move it. New facts are treated as unverified, so it will tell you how they would change things if true.
What can I paste in?
A WhatsApp, iMessage or Slack exchange, a Reddit or forum thread, an email chain, an opinion piece, or a short summary of both positions. It needs both sides of the disagreement, up to about 24,000 characters.
Is my chat stored?
No. Fire Pixel does not save or log what you paste, and the page masks it from session recording. The text goes to the AI model you pick for that one answer: Claude through Anthropic, the others through OpenRouter, routed only to providers that do not train on it or keep it.
Is it free?
Yes, with no account. You get up to 30 judge replies a day, and one case can take up to 12 including second opinions and arguing back. The free verdicts share a daily budget, so on a busy day they can run out early. They reset at midnight UTC.
Should I trust it over a person?
Treat it as a sharp, disinterested referee, not a court. It only sees what you paste, so a one-sided screenshot gets a one-sided verdict. It can be wrong on facts it cannot check, and it says so when a claim is unverified.
Evidence over opinion
Fire Pixel settles Google Ads arguments the same way.
Strip out the noise, check what the data actually shows, and name the fix. For businesses that want their ad spend judged on outcomes.